Results 1 to 5 of 5
2 Likes
  • 2 Post By Petaris

Thread: Why is Japan so anti-nuclear power?

  1. #1
    Regular Member Male
    Join Date Jan 13, 2005
    Location Singapore
    Posts 142
    Singapore

    Post Why is Japan so anti-nuclear power?


    国際交流パーティー - Tokyo International Party

    I've read in the news there is fierce opposition to the restarting of Japan's nuclear plants.
    I know it's partially because of the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster that occurred last year.
    But could it also be because they experienced nuclear attack first hand?
    Is this a major reason why they're so anti-nuclear?
    Japan can rely on fossil fuels for energy, but oil prices are quite volatile. And Japan's economic growth was badly affected by the oil shock of the 70s.
  2. #2
    Sailing away... Male
    Join Date Aug 3, 2007
    Location NW Wisconsin
    Posts 407
    United States
    I don't think it has anything to do with the bombings in WWII. For one nuclear power does not equal nuclear weapons. They are very different things, a nuclear power reactor could never detonate like a nuclear weapon. I think it is mostly due to the accident and probably even more so with the failings of TEPCO and the Japanese government to handle the situation appropriately. Also people are scared of things they don't understand, and the media hype doesn't help. The more you understand about the way nuclear power works the less you fear it, though that doesn't mean you don't respect the dangers involved. I don't fear nuclear power but I also think that we need to keep researching and developing other options. My opposition to it has more to do with dealing with the waste that is produced. I don't approve of just burying it under some mountain or keeping it in dry casks or in cooling pools. There are things we could do with it, for example there is a type of reactor that we could use that spent fuel in and it would "burn" up most of it while extracting a considerable amount of power at the same time. The waste from that type of reactor is substantially smaller in amount and also far less radio-active. I think I remember reading that the waste would have a half-life of ~300 years, far better then the ~10,000 years of the waste from current reactors. This type of reactor would not only provide power but also allow us to use the current stockpile of radioactive waste as fuel. It of course has other issues to be considered, I think one was that it was liquid sodium cooled. The reason we haven't seen these reactors being built is the same reason other modern reactor designs haven't been built, namely public opinion (not in my back yard) and cost.

    I don't have time now but I will look up that reactor type and post a link to more info about it. I want to say it was an IFR type but I could be mistaken about that. I will try to post an update later tonight with a Wikipedia link or something.
    Glenn and ewww like this.
    --------------
    - Petaris

    "The World is Open. Are You?"
  3. #3
    Sailing away... Male
    Join Date Aug 3, 2007
    Location NW Wisconsin
    Posts 407
    United States
    Sorry for my late post, I didn't get a chance to look up the link last night.

    Here is the link to the IFR Wikipedia page: Integral Fast Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Its interesting, but not surprising, that the project was canceled by congress.
  4. #4
    Junior Member Male
    Join Date Oct 13, 2012
    Location Phoenix
    Posts 4
    USA - Arizona
    I would have to agree with Petaris. Since Japan's lack of natural resources is such a large hurdle for Japan to get over ( and has partially promoted their imperialistic actions of the past overseas ) I think that it is simply due to the catastrophe that occurred in March of 2011. However.. I also believe that people are most likely tying together the damage from both the tsunami and the power plant into one collectivity. At least that is their perception and because of this, the push for the no nuclear power has increased.
  5. #5
    Junior Member Male
    Join Date Oct 15, 2012
    Location Tokyo
    Posts 8
    Japan
    Most Japanese people oppose to restart nuclear power plants simply because of the Fukushima accidents. They don't know anything about risks of completely stopping the nuclear power plants.

Similar Threads

  1. Why Nuclear Power Station?
    By annawantsmore in forum Japanese News & Hot Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Apr 19, 2011, 14:36
  2. Nuclear power
    By Lledargo in forum Serious Discussions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Apr 19, 2011, 12:01
  3. Japan, Vietnam Warming To Nuclear Power Deal
    By shevaub in forum Serious Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Mar 23, 2009, 07:35
  4. Earthquake and the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant
    By Han Chan in forum Japanese News & Hot Topics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: May 27, 2008, 00:54
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jun 17, 2005, 01:55

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

About JREF

JREF is a travel, language and study guide on all things Japanese, with a constantly growing travel section, a discussion forum, a section on Japanese language, a Japan gallery, a comprehensive directory, a Japan-related classifieds section and a place where you can find Japanese friends, pen pals, or more.
Copyright © 1999-2013 Japan Reference All Rights Reserved