|
|
|
| About JREF | Contact Us | JREF Shop | Topsites | Advertising | Sitemap | Help |
|
||||||||
| Science & Technology Anything related to Japanese Hi-Tech, science, widgets and gadgets. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 23, 2005
Posts: 2
![]() ![]() |
Theory of gravitation and creation of Universe
New theory of the gravitation and cteation of the Universe.
Look http://www.arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/pa...10/0410365.pdf Author Sergey Orlov. ion@onego.ru |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Chukchi Salmon
![]() Join Date: Dec 22, 2004
Location: Sunny South Korea
Posts: 2,223
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Originally Posted by Orlov
Hi, Orlov.
I just noticed this is your first post, and would like you to let you know that you are very welcome here. This is a very international site, and you will find many interesting people and ideas. I hope you enjoy what you find here. I'm also impressed with your article, but my college math. is rather dusty. So in the meantime, maybe you can help me understand some points of science history. I would presume you have a more detailed manuscript from which your present article is summarized. The ether theory you are employing used to be the standard concept of the universe not occupied by celestial bodies or gas prior to the special theory of relativity. That long-held theory, however, has been replaced by the new theroy. How does your idea of "ether" differ from the previous notion of "ether" that has been discounted so effectively? Can you explain to me your train of logic as to why an alternate theory of gravitation became necessary? Or is your article only another way of interpreting the classical model? If your answer is yes, how is your theory complementary to the classical model? For example, the wave model and the particle model each illuminate and explain certain aspects of the so-called quantum phenomenon. Could you draw some parallels in a way that I can understand your theory better?
__________________
Z: The fish in the water are happy. H: How do you know ? You're not fish. Z: How do you know I don't ? You're not me. H: True I am not you, and I cannot know. Likewise, I know you're not, therefore I know you don't. Z: You asked me how I knew implying you knew I knew. In fact I saw some fish, strolling down by the Hao River, all jolly and gay. --Zhuangzi |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|