lexico
後輩
- 22 Dec 2004
- 2,343
- 154
- 73
komachi said:I just quoted some lines from this book, written by a Hongkong person.
If what Mr Xie Yongguang is saying is true, it would be necessary to investigate Korean war crimes against the Chinese. I wonder if any of the crimes were touched upon in Tokyo's IMTFE trial or the Chinese military tribunal. If not, this would be another example of war crimes not being exposed sooner or immediately after the war, but becoming public only after more than 50 yrs.
But my question was also, "So how does that invalidate my post ?"
sorry, I tried it. Is the use of the nucleus acquitted because they are victims of Old Japan?
I see it now. I think the question may have had two parts;
1) Is the US gov't innocent in using the A-bomb on the Japanese civilians because the US suffered attacks and war losses with IJA?
2) Will the Japanese gov't remain innocent in its possible future use of the A-bomb against a possible nuclear onslaught by a foreign country such as N.Korea or China?
I wrote it; I probably should have dug up anti-nuclear writing by a Japanese citizen, but I just wrote something that I thought any conscientious person with some understanding of the cruelty of 1) the IJA atrocities and 2) the A-bomb could have written. I believe I was clear by saying that I was giving you a sample statement; in fact, I referred to it as an "example," or "sample" several times.What is this group?
Signed-- by whoever can rightfully represent the people of Japan
I understand better what you said; but how does that make my statement "wrong ?"