Your source said there was a steady growth before whaling.
So the population maximum means the population when the whaling began (1904).
Is that right?
BTW, in your opinion, is the population of minke whales in the Antarctic increasing (recovering) ?
I guessed "original population" means the population before starting whalefishing (in 1904 in Antrarcitic).
Is that right? If not, please define what is the "original population."
And if possible, please show me the source you use.
Firstly, as a minke whale reproduces annually and easily recovered its population, I doubt that we shouldn't hunt them until they recover its original popuration.
Secondly, I think you made a mistake.
Whale count wrong, DNA study reveals
The estimates I used are about the population in...
Other sources.
http://www.defra.gov.uk/fish/cetaceans/factsheet.htm
iwcoffice.org - This website is for sale! - iwcoffice Resources and Information.
If you think the statistics I use are flawed, you should show other statistics.
This history textbook never mentioned libarating the Indonesians was main purpose.
It says that the war was for self-defece not liberating Asian coutries according to Japanese government at that time.
This textbook doesn't mention whether that war is for self-defence or not.
It doesn't...
@Martialartsnovice
@sabro
Sorry for my poor English.
I mean
"How does the textbook downplay the Nanjing Atrocities?"
"How does the textbook justify the WWII?"
"What do you think the textbook says?"
Whatever I say, I think you will believe what you learnt from your textbooks or whatever.
So first of all, I want to ask you one thing.
What do you think the contravertial textbook mention about the Nanjing Atrocities and WWII in general?
Do not omit the last part.
風便則二日可到 一説干山 鬱陵 本一島
You can reach (there) in 2 days in fine wind.
Some say Usan and Ullung are the same island.
1898 "Of the six subordinate small islands, the most widely known are Usan Island 于山島 and Jukdo Island 竹島."
1899 A map was published
Actually, there are...
From the interview of Yang from the link you gave.
Even according to the Chinese scholar,what really happened in Nanking is disputable.(He seems to have similar view to Chinese government though)
An English scholar seems to support Japanese side (middle of the road).
ejcjs - The Nanjing...
But after the correction of European maps, in Japan, some maps still remained confusing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bungyun_by_Japan_1878.jpg
Thanks for a good source.
Unfortunately, Dajoukan concluded Takeshima and Matsushima were not Japanese territories in 1877. I agree with you...
Sorry I should have mentioned,
According to the burital record of Red Swatika Society,over 99% were men.
It clearly denies the indiscriminate massacre.
@A5573A
No.They would not become emotional.
Some(mostly women) would say there was 300,000 massacre and others would say like what I...
What I meantioned on last post is;
according to Korean source,
1 they were not sure whether Usando and Ullundo are the same island or not.
2 in Usando,there were 15 houses and 86 people.
thus Usando cannot be Dokdo
3 Before the Korean proclaimation of sovereignty(?) of Sokto,Korean...
Did I keep silence about Port Author atrocities?
What you said is exactly what I want to say to the Chinese.
Could you give me the reason why over 99% or corpses were men?
What is the evidence of 300,000?
What is solid evidence?
Sorry,I did know hangul was introduced by Japanese,but I misunderstood when.
So I editted the post:
As bossel mentioned,it does not prove forcible recruitments.
Sorry this quetiion must be offensive,but what you say is like that.
Do you have any scientific proof that support the...
I just wanted to show why the name of Takeshima and Ullungdo changed.
So last one is enough to show Dokdo had been called "Rienkoworuto Rokku"(Liancourt Rocks) ,Ullungdo had been called "Matsushima" and an island which does not exsit had been called "Takeshima" before the minister concluded...
Yes,the ministry concluded "takeshima" and "matsushima" are Chosen territory.
But they are definately Daglets and Argonaut checking their degrees and minites in Japanese map published in1870,as Tanaka mentions.
サービス終了のお知らせ
窶處ニ歎ニ筑"Takeshima"(Argonaut)
ツ渉シニ歎ニ筑"Matsushima"(Daglet)...
First of all, I have a doubt that China tried to add the figures which had already counted in another report.
Because:
1 Red Swatika Society' figure contains several records done by other chirities
2 none of them were mentioned in the IMTFE besides the two biggest figures(Tsun Shan Tong and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.